The problem with this statement is that is goes against logic. And what is logic but reason that is based on a sequence of facts or events when taken as a whole and based on our past experience we conclude to be true. So how in the world can we argue that when we help someone we have done not only a good deed, but the deed is both right and correct.
Is the act of giving a less fortunate person some change the right thing to do? Or would it be more correct to give that person the opportunity to earn for themselves?
It can be a hard decision. The first choice is simple and does not cause the giver to take accountability, while the second places the giver in a position of both acceptance for the sake of the receiver and accountability to any other person in a like situation. So is it better to be "Right or Correct"?
Is the act of giving a less fortunate person some change the right thing to do? Or would it be more correct to give that person the opportunity to earn for themselves?
It can be a hard decision. The first choice is simple and does not cause the giver to take accountability, while the second places the giver in a position of both acceptance for the sake of the receiver and accountability to any other person in a like situation. So is it better to be "Right or Correct"?
No comments:
Post a Comment